India Statutory social-insurance contributions

What this value means

India changed its entire statutory basis for payroll social insurance between November 2025 and July 2026, and any engine still citing the EPF & MP Act, 1952, the ESI Act, 1948, the ESI (Central) Rules, 1950 or the BOCW Welfare Cess Act, 1996 as the operative instrument is now citing repealed or superseded law. The Code on Social Security, 2020 was brought into force by S.O. 5319(E) of 21 November 2025; a corrigendum, S.O. 5936(E) of 19 December 2025, corrected the entries for ss. 15, 16 and 164 to record that s. 16(1)(a), (b) and 16(2) — the contribution provisions — had already commenced on 3 May 2023 under S.O. 2060(E), with only s. 16(1)(c) commencing in November 2025. On 8 May 2026 the Ministry notified the Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026 (G.S.R. 344(E)) together with a large package of s. 2 and Chapter-level notifications. On 29 June 2026 it notified three replacement schemes — EPF Scheme 2026 (G.S.R. 525(E)), EDLI Scheme 2026 (G.S.R. 526(E)) and EPS 2026 (G.S.R. 527(E)) — superseding the 1952, 1976 and 1995 schemes respectively. On 1 July 2026 it notified the three Chapter III contribution rates. Rates and the wage ceiling did not change; the legal citations changed completely. The traps, in the order they cost money: 1. CONSOLIDATED-TEXT TRAP ON THE PF RATE. s. 16(1)(a) says the contribution "shall be ten per cent. of the wages" in its operative words, twice. Twelve per cent appears only in the first proviso, which permits substitution by notification "at both the places where they occur" for establishments the Central Government specifies. S.O. 3582(E) of 1 July 2026 is that notification and it covers establishments under s. 1(4), 1(5) and 1(6) — effectively all — leaving 10% only for what it excludes (jute, beedi, brick, coir other than spinning and guar gum factories, and establishments with an approved resolution or repayment plan under the IBC). Para 18(2) of the EPF Scheme, 2026 inverts the emphasis and states 12% as the rule. Read the Code alone and you will build a 10% engine. 2. THE 50% DEEMING RULE ON THE WAGE BASE. This is the largest financial change and it is not a rate change. s. 2(88) defines wages as basic pay + dearness allowance + retaining allowance and excludes, at sub-clauses (a) to (k), statutory bonus, house accommodation and amenities, employer pension/PF contributions, conveyance allowance, special-expenses payments, house rent allowance, award/settlement remuneration, overtime allowance, commission, gratuity and retrenchment/retirement payments. But the first proviso states that where the payments under sub-clauses (a) to (i) exceed one-half of all remuneration — or such other per cent. as the Central Government notifies — the excess is deemed remuneration and is added back into wages. Allowance-heavy Indian salary structures, historically engineered to keep "basic" low, are exactly the target. An engine that computes PF or ESI on the contractual basic alone now understates the base for a large share of the workforce. The Explanation deems remuneration in kind up to 15% of total wages to be part of wages. A second proviso brings sub-clauses (d), (f), (g) and (h) back into the computation for equal-remuneration and payment-of-wages purposes only — not for contributions. 3. CEILING VERSUS THRESHOLD, TWICE OVER, AND THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING. - EPF: INR 15,000/month is BOTH. As a contribution ceiling it caps both shares (para 18(3) read with S.O. 2702(E) — note para 18(3) itself states no figure, so the entire ceiling rests on that notification). As an eligibility threshold it defines "excluded employee" in para 2(f)(i) — an employee whose wage exceeds the ceiling at the moment he would otherwise first become a member is outside the scheme. The two operate differently: an existing member who rises above 15,000 stays a member but contributes on 15,000; a new joiner above 15,000 need not be enrolled. Para 9(4) allows the employee and employer to opt in jointly and in writing to enrol or to contribute on wages exceeding the ceiling, and its proviso then requires the employer to pay administrative charges and comply with all statutory provisions on the higher wage. - ESI: INR 21,000/month is ONLY a threshold, never a ceiling. Contributions are computed on full wages with no cap. This is the single most common ESI error. - Separately, the ESTABLISHMENT coverage thresholds are a third distinct concept, in the First Schedule: Chapter III (PF) twenty or more employees; Chapter IV (ESI) ten or more persons other than a seasonal factory, with a proviso extending it to notified hazardous or life-threatening occupations employing even a single employee and another allowing a plantation employer to opt in; gratuity and maternity ten or more for shops/establishments. Conflating headcount coverage with wage ceilings is a classic error. 4. EPS IS CARVED OUT, NOT ADDED. 8.33% goes to the Pension Fund out of the employer's 12%, per the express words of s. 16(1)(b)(i) and para 4(1) of EPS 2026. Employer cost is 12%, not 20.33%. The extra 1.16% is a Central Government subvention under para 4(2) and belongs on neither side of the payslip — except for pre-2014 joint-option members, where the second proviso to para 4(2) makes the employer pay 9.49% on the slice of wages exceeding INR 15,000. 5. ONE EMPLOYER-ONLY RATE IS NOTIFIED AND ONE IS STILL NOT. EDLI (para 5(2), EDLI Scheme 2026) and EPF administrative charges (paras 28(2) and 29(1), EPF Scheme 2026) both leave the percentage to the Central Government. The EDLI rate HAS been fixed, at 0.50% by S.O. 3581(E) of 1 July 2026. The administrative-charges percentage has NOT — no notification under the Code has been found — so it alone remains null. Both are real employer costs absent from the 12+12 headline. 6. ESI ROUNDS UP; EPF ROUNDS TO NEAREST. Rule 19 of the Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026 rounds each ESI contribution to the next higher rupee. EPF para 18(5), EPS para 4(3) and EDLI para 5(3) round to the nearest rupee with 50 paise or more going up. Applying one rule to both is wrong on one of them. 7. NATIONALITY-DEPENDENT LIABILITY. Para 2(j) of the EPF Scheme, 2026 defines an International Worker by passport. Nepalese and Bhutanese nationals are deemed Indian workers by treaty. Para 2(f)(ii) excludes detached workers who remain covered at home under a reciprocal social security agreement, or under a pre-1 October 2008 bilateral comprehensive economic agreement with a social security clause. Para 9(6) requires an International Worker carrying out an employed activity in a country in the Table — which currently lists only the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — to contribute, with the employer, on TOTAL wages as defined in s. 2(88), i.e. without the INR 15,000 ceiling, where detachment benefit is taken. Foreign nationals must be routed separately. 8. DEDUCTIBILITY IS REGIME-DEPENDENT, SO THE FIELD IS NULL. The employee's EPF contribution is deductible before income tax only under the optional old regime. India's default personal tax regime does not allow the deduction, and the Income-tax Act, 2025 is now the operative income tax statute — the EPF Scheme 2026 itself refers to PAN "under the Income Tax Act, 2025" at para 25. An engine that unconditionally deducts employee PF from taxable income will overstate net pay for the majority of employees on the default regime. Employer PF contributions are exempt in the employee's hands only up to an aggregate annual cap across PF, NPS and superannuation, with the excess taxable as perquisite. tax_deductible is therefore null on every scheme rather than a misleading boolean. 9. LIABILITY SITS WITH THE PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER. Paras 20–22 of the EPF Scheme 2026 and s. 31 of the Code make the principal employer liable in the first instance for both shares plus administrative charges, including for contract labour, with recovery of the employee's share by wage deduction only. The employer's share can never be deducted from or recovered from the employee (para 21; s. 31(3) for ESI; para 8 of the EDLI Scheme). s. 17 lets the employer recover amounts from a contractor, and the contractor recover the employee's share from the employee. SCOPE EXCLUSIONS: this covers an ordinary private-sector employee, plus the construction cess for construction employers. Not covered here — exempted establishments running their own PF trusts under s. 143, government employees on separate pension rules, the unorganised/gig/platform worker schemes under Chapter IX, seasonal factories, cine-workers, and Professional Tax (a State-level payslip deduction that is a tax, not social insurance, levied on slabs by roughly half the States and capped at INR 2,500 per person per year by the Constitution). SUB-NATIONAL VARIATION: Rates for EPF, EPS, EDLI and ESI, and the building-workers' cess, are uniform across India — there is no State variation in any statutory contribution percentage, nor in the INR 15,000 / INR 21,000 figures, nor in the 1% cess. Variation enters in five other ways, and all five matter to a payroll or cost engine: 1. LABOUR WELFARE FUND — genuinely State-set, with no national scheme. Levied in roughly fifteen jurisdictions including IN-MH Maharashtra, IN-KA Karnataka, IN-TN Tamil Nadu, IN-GJ Gujarat, IN-DL Delhi, IN-WB West Bengal, IN-KL Kerala, IN-MP Madhya Pradesh, IN-PB Punjab, IN-HR Haryana, IN-AP Andhra Pradesh, IN-TG Telangana, IN-CT Chhattisgarh, IN-OR Odisha and IN-GA Goa. Flat rupee amounts, differing employee and employer shares, differing periodicity (mostly half-yearly or annual, not monthly) and differing category exclusions. Absent entirely in the remaining States and most UTs. 2. PROFESSIONAL TAX — a State tax on employment, deducted from the payslip, levied on wage slabs. Present in IN-MH, IN-KA, IN-WB, IN-TN, IN-AP, IN-TG, IN-GJ, IN-MP, IN-OR, IN-KL, IN-AS, IN-BR, IN-JH, IN-MN, IN-MZ, IN-NL, IN-SK, IN-TR and IN-ML among others; absent in IN-DL, IN-HR, IN-UP, IN-RJ, IN-PB and others. Constitutionally capped at INR 2,500 per person per year. It is a tax, not social insurance, but it is a mandatory payroll deduction and belongs in any net-pay computation. 3. ESI GEOGRAPHIC IMPLEMENTATION — ESI is not in force everywhere. The third proviso to the First Schedule entry for Chapter IV makes contributions payable under s. 29 only from the date on which the Corporation actually provides benefits to the employees of the establishment, as notified by the Central Government. An establishment in a non-implemented district has no ESI liability at all, and reduced rates are reported for the first 24 months in newly implemented areas. This is a district-level, not State-level, determination. 4. ESI HEADCOUNT THRESHOLD — the First Schedule sets ten or more persons other than a seasonal factory, but several States apply twenty for shops and commercial establishments under their own notifications, so the coverage test itself is State-dependent even though the rate is not. 5. CONSTRUCTION CESS DOUBLE-LEVY RELIEF — s. 102 of the Code lets the appropriate Government exempt an employer or class of employers in a State from the Chapter VIII cess where a cess is already levied and payable under a corresponding law in force in that State. Whether the 1% national cess or an existing State levy is the one actually collected is therefore a State-by-State question, and States also run their own assessment and collection machinery through local authorities under s. 100(2)–(3). WHAT WE DO NOT PUT A NUMBER ON: Deliberately returned as null rather than given a number: 1. EPF administrative charges rate. Read verbatim in the gazette: para 28(2) of the EPF Scheme, 2026 refers only to "administrative charge of such percentage of wages", and para 29(1) leaves the percentage to the Central Government in consultation with the Central Board. The Scheme contains no figure and, unlike EPS and EDLI, no notification fixing this percentage under the Code has been found — the 1 July 2026 series (S.O. 3580(E), 3581(E), 3582(E)) fixed the pension, insurance and provident fund rates but not this one. The 0.50% figure in circulation, with a monthly per-establishment minimum reported as INR 500 (INR 75 for non-contributory months), traces to an EPFO circular under the superseded 1952 Scheme and is not asserted. 2. Labour Welfare Fund employee and employer amounts. No national rate exists. Set by each State's own Act, in flat rupee amounts, on differing periodicities and with differing category exclusions. Any single national figure would be wrong. 3. Gratuity, Maternity Benefit and Employees' Compensation rates. These branches genuinely have no contribution percentage — gratuity is a defined benefit paid on exit, maternity benefit is paid directly by the employer at the woman's average daily wage plus the INR 3,500 medical bonus under s. 64, and Employees' Compensation is a direct employer liability on injury that applies only where Chapter IV does not. All three are included with null rates so the branches are visibly present rather than silently missing. Where gratuity liability is insured under s. 57, the premium is insurer-rated, not statutory. 4. ESI employee-contribution floor. WITHDRAWN, not merely unconverted. The earlier record asserted a live exemption from the employee's share for an average daily wage not exceeding INR 176. That exemption sat in rule 52 of the ESI (Central) Rules, 1950, which G.S.R. 344(E) of 8 May 2026 expressly superseded. Rule 19 of the Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026 contains no equivalent and no such provision appears anywhere in those Rules. floor_monthly is null because the exemption could not be shown to survive, not because a daily figure resisted conversion. 5. Tax deductibility, on every scheme. Set to null throughout rather than to a boolean. For the employee's EPF share the answer is regime-dependent — allowable under the optional old regime, not under the default regime — so neither true nor false is correct at country level. For the employer-only branches the question does not arise on the employee side. Whether the employee's ESI contribution is allowable under the Income-tax Act, 2025, and under which regime, was not verified. 6. Reduced ESI rates for newly implemented areas. A reduced first-24-month rate is reported but the prescribing instrument was not read, so no reduced rate appears in the structured fields. The INR 25,000/month coverage limit for a person with disability is stated in the notes only; rule 19(2)–(3) of the 2026 Rules, which were read, provide the separate three-year employer-share concession for such employees but do not restate that limit. 7. The s. 16(1)(c) proviso administration charge for EDLI. The Code permits the Central Government to require the employer to pay a further sum, not exceeding one-fourth of the EDLI contribution, towards administering the Insurance Scheme. No determination under the Code was located, so it is not modelled. ALREADY LEGISLATED, NOT YET IN FORCE: No legislated change to any contribution rate, to the INR 15,000 Chapter III wage ceiling, to the INR 21,000 ESI coverage threshold or to the 1% construction cess is pending as at 8 August 2026. Dated items that will force a re-verify: - 20 NOVEMBER 2026 — HARD DEADLINE. s. 164(2)(b) keeps the schemes, rules and regulations made under the repealed EPF and ESI Acts in force, to the extent not inconsistent with the Code, for one year from the Code's commencement on 21 November 2025. That saving lapses on 20 November 2026. The EPF, EPS and EDLI schemes have already been replaced and the ESI (Central) Rules, 1950 already superseded, so the main exposure is anything still resting on saved pre-Code instruments — above all the INR 21,000 ESI coverage figure (see next item). Re-verify before that date. - ESI CHAPTER IV WAGE CEILING. s. 2(89) contemplates a wage ceiling notified for both Chapter III and Chapter IV, and S.O. 2351(E) expressly refers to "the wage ceiling as may be notified by the Central Government under clause (89) of section 2 of the Code for the purposes of becoming a member under Chapter IV". Only the Chapter III figure has been notified, by S.O. 2702(E). No Chapter IV notification has been located and the Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026 restate no wage limit. INR 21,000 currently stands via s. 164(2)(a), which deems notifications under the repealed enactments to have been made under the corresponding provisions of the Code and keeps them in force until repealed under it. A fresh s. 2(89) notification for Chapter IV is the single most likely instrument change in this record. HIGHEST PRIORITY re-verify. - EPF ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES PERCENTAGE. Para 29(1) of the EPF Scheme, 2026 requires a Central Government determination in consultation with the Central Board. Three rate notifications issued on 1 July 2026 and this was not among them. Until one is located and read, the rate stays null. HIGH PRIORITY re-verify. - WAGE-CEILING RUMOURS. S.O. 2702(E) of 29 May 2026 merely restated INR 15,000, which has stood since 1 September 2014, and was widely and wrongly reported as an increase. Proposals to raise it to INR 21,000 or INR 25,000, and to raise the ESI threshold to INR 25,000 or INR 30,000, circulate persistently in the press; none is legislated. Treat any "ceiling raised" report as false until an s. 2(89) notification with a different figure is read. - CONSTRUCTION CESS BAND. s. 100(1) permits any rate from 1% to 2% "from time to time"; S.O. 2322(E) sits at the floor. A fresh notification could move it within that band without any amendment to the Code. - COMPLIANCE WINDOWS, NOT RATE CHANGES. Employees' Enrolment Campaign 2026 ran to 31 October 2026, alongside VISHWAS 2026 (damages settlement) and AMNESTY 2026 (regularisation for exempted establishments). Damages for default under the 2026 Scheme are a tiered 0.25% (default under two months), 0.50% (two to four months) and 1% (over four months) of arrears per month, capped at the amount of arrears (para 23, read verbatim). Interest on delayed contributions is 12% per annum under S.O. 2698(E), effective 21 November 2025. - INDIA–UNITED KINGDOM social security agreement signed 15 July 2026, with a 60-month detachment period; the United Kingdom is currently the only entry in the para 9(6) Table. Additional countries entering that Table would change International Worker treatment. Suggested re-verify deadline: 60 days, driven by the 20 November 2026 lapse of the s. 164(2) savings and the outstanding Chapter IV ceiling and administrative-charges notifications rather than by any expected rate movement. SOURCING CAVEATS: Everything in this record except the four items below was read verbatim in the primary instrument: the Code on Social Security, 2020 (downloaded from the cited India Code URL, which loads); the Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026 (G.S.R. 344(E)); the EPF, EPS and EDLI Schemes 2026 in their bilingual Gazette of India texts; and the gazettes of S.O. 2702(E), S.O. 2351(E) and S.O. 2322(E). 1. S.O. 3580(E), S.O. 3581(E) and S.O. 3582(E), all dated 1 July 2026, were NOT read in their own gazette. Repeated attempts to reach them failed: epfindia.gov.in does not resolve, epfo.gov.in returns a CloudFront 403 to automated clients, and a scan of the e-gazette ID range around the scheme publications did not surface them (e-gazette IDs are not ordered by S.O. number). They are corroborated by four independent sources that state the numbers, rates, enabling provisions and effective dates consistently: a compliance newsletter that reproduces gazettes and states S.O. 3580(E) = 8.33% to the Pension Fund and S.O. 3581(E) = 0.50% to the Insurance Fund, both for Chapter III and both effective from the commencement of their schemes on 29 June 2026; two law-firm alerts giving S.O. 3580(E) under s. 16(1)(b)(i) and S.O. 3582(E) as the 12% notification deemed in force from 21 November 2025; and a legal publisher's summary of all three. Materially this only matters for EDLI: the 8.33% and 12% figures are independently fixed in EPS para 4(1) and EPF para 18(2), which were read verbatim, whereas the EDLI 0.50% rests on the notification alone. If the EDLI figure must be primary-only, that scheme should be flagged secondary; the rest of the record should not. 2. The INR 21,000 ESI coverage threshold has no located instrument under the Code. It is carried by s. 164(2)(a) from rule 50 of the ESI (Central) Rules, 1950 as amended with effect from 1 January 2017 — rules that were superseded on 8 May 2026 and were not read. The figure is universally reported as current and unchanged, and s. 164(2)(a) is a sound mechanism for its survival, but the citation is a saved instrument rather than a live one. The same applies to the INR 25,000 limit for a person with disability. 3. ESI contribution periods (conventionally 1 April–30 September and 1 October–31 March) sit in regulations made under s. 157, which were not read. Rule 2(1)(q) of the 2026 Rules was read and defines a contribution period only as "the period not exceeding six consecutive months, as specified in the regulations". 4. esic.gov.in is unreachable (connection refused on TLS), so ESIC's own rate page could not be consulted. This does not weaken the ESI rates, which are now read verbatim in rule 19 of the Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026 — a primary source superior to an authority web page — but it does mean no ESIC-published confirmation of the INR 21,000 threshold was obtained. ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE. effective_from is 2026-06-29 and this was tested hard rather than assumed. Para 1(2) of each of the three schemes provides that it comes into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette. All three gazettes carry the masthead "NEW DELHI, MONDAY, JUNE 29, 2026 / ASHADHA 8, 1948" and each notification is signed "New Delhi, the 29th June, 2026". The CG-DL-E strings (CG-DL-E-01072026-273957 for EPF, CG-DL-E-30062026-273951 for EPS, CG-DL-E-30062026-273942 for EDLI) are e-gazette electronic upload references, not the date of the gazette issue. Decisively, the Central Government's own rate notifications recite the commencement of the EPS and EDLI Schemes as "29th June, 2026". Some professional commentary states 1 July 2026 for EPF by reading the upload stamp; that is not followed. Payroll consequence: the schemes bite from the June 2026 wage month, not July. Researched against primary instruments and then attacked by an independent adversarial verification pass before being served (2026-08-08). Where that pass found a defect, the correction it proved from the instrument has been applied. Employee and employer shares are stated separately: the employee figure is what leaves the payslip, the employer figure is cost of employment and is not a deduction.

Get it programmatically

curl https://asiaref.dev/v1/in/social-contributions
# $0.005 per call — x402 on Base (USDC). No key, no signup.
# History:    curl https://asiaref.dev/v1/in/social-contributions/history?from=2020-01-01
# Provenance: curl https://asiaref.dev/provenance/in/social-contributions

Other India series: RBI policy repo rate · GST standard rate · VAT registration threshold · Minimum wage · Public holidays · CPI inflation (year-on-year) · Corporate income tax rate · Personal income tax bands